UPDATED Part 7: Who killed Charlie and why?
Some people ask me why I am so tenacious about covering every detail of Charlie's assassination. Honestly, the focus helps me deal with my grief and keeps me from crying all day long. This one hit me hard, as I know it did you.
This is the last chapter of my report on Charlie’s murder. You can find all the chapters of my research on the execution of Charlie Kirk here: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7. I suggest you read them in order - they build on each other to create the whole picture.
Some 300,000, mostly young people, lined up early this morning for Charlie's worship service and funeral today in Arizona. Praise God!
At last count, over 100 MILLION people watched Charlie’s service on all streaming channels and church attendance is skyrocketing. Amazing!
President Trump: “Charlie was such a good guy. I said, ‘Charlie, someday I think you have a good chance of being President.’ I've never seen young people, or any group, go to one person like they did to Charlie.”
If you remember nothing else - remember that. That’s obviously the reason they killed him - because he was a man of deep faith and he loved Jesus, he loved his wife, Erika, and his family, he loved America, he loved President Trump, he resonated with young people like no other and he was likely going to be President one day. Charlie said he wanted to be remembered for the “courage of his faith” and the atheists and Satanists couldn’t have that.
Stephen Miller stated today that there is NO statute of limitations on trying to overthrow the Government and that many of the coup plotters are still employed and protecting the Deep State and Team Obama.
STEPHEN MILLER: “There are still deep-state coup plotters who are trying to conceal and hide information on behalf of Barack Obama — they’re protecting. There are still staffers in the Government who know the full truth, who are concealing that truth. So, all of this behavior, all of this conduct, collectively means the seditious conspiracy hasn’t ended — it is ongoing.”
REMEMBER: The close-up graphic video of Charlie's execution is EXACTLY what they hoped to do to President Trump in Butler! They wanted to recreate the horrific image of the murder of JFK!
That’s why regardless of HOW they did it - or who they framed as a patsy for it - I contend that the people who executed Charlie are the same people who tried to execute President Trump!
Who stood the most to gain from the deaths of both President Trump and Charlie Kirk? The Globalists, the Koch Libertarians, Soros and their liberal NGOs and donors - their atheist and Satanic Islamo-Communist allies in China, Russia and Iran - and their demon foot soldiers embedded in the FBI, CIA, Antifa, Armed Queers, the cartels and other Islamo-Communist terrorist organizations. The evil goes way way back.
Who is REALLY behind it all?
If you want to know who REALLY runs the world and where they came from, this is a must read.
“Charlie was murdered by the DARK for showing people the light!”
In fact, right after Charlie’s assassination, Marco Rubio, Devin Nunes & President Trump all called out Soros and his NGOs and his Islamo-Communist partners in crime and told his team to go after the evil puppet masters with RICO.
The Globalist LEFT, the RINOs, the Koch Libertarians and their allies in Islamo-Communist nations had the most to gain from taking out Charlie. President Trump even made a point of calling out Hamas (Iran) and Ilhan Omar (Muslim Brotherhood) in back-to-back posts right after Charlie was murdered. He always shines a light on the demons.
Also, right after Charlie’s assassination, the Communist AOC announced she was probably going to run for President - as I predicted months ago in my series called Madame President. Isn’t it convenient that she announced that right after her strongest opponent (Charlie Kirk) is now dead?
Also, after Charlie’s assassination, the Governor of Utah, the RINO Spencer Cox, went on 60 Minutes and many have now called him to run for President, including praise from Obama. Why did they CHOOSE Utah to take out Charlie Kirk? I address that here:
Governor for Hire
All week long I’ve been trying to explain something “abstractly” on social media - hoping people would get it. It appears I’m not doing a very good job so I’m just going to spell it out - step by step.
Erika Kirk said there are so many "theories" floating around about Charlie that she is doing a show next week on them all. She confirmed that Charlie was NOT wearing a bullet proof vest - that he was confident in his security team at UVU - and that she does not want the death penalty for Tyler and that she “forgives him” for his knows not what he’s done.
Hmm. There was NO security at Utah Valley University that I saw. It was just like Butler - non-existent. That is a big red flag to me. That tells me that someone on the inside - TPUSA team, the University and the Utah authorities are compromised as well. There are snakes embedded everywhere - we should all know that by now.
FBI Deputy Director Bongino announced that there were "multiple warning signs" online before the assassination, and the evidence suggests that many people might have known in advance.
BONGINO: “From the data we've accumulated - people knew in advance."
Megyn Kelly also stated that her “inside source” at the FBI told her there were at least 7 online accounts associated with Antifa or the Armed Queers or other known Communist organizations who were aware it was going to happen - at least 5 days in advance. So, the story we were told by Governor Cox and the Utah authorities that this kid acted alone and didn’t tell anyone is apparently a proven lie.
I’ve examined dozens of theories from hundreds of accounts. The amount of propaganda that was released after Charlie’s death is overwhelming and smacks of two things. 1) There are HUGE and VALID questions regarding the story we were told by the Utah authorities about HOW Charlie was killed 2) There are also way too many people trying to point fingers away from the Islamo-Communists to get people to focus on other things.
Kash said today he is going to address ALL the conspiracies and we should hold him to this - and make sure we make our questions and our voices heard:
KASH PATEL: "As the Director of the FBI, I am committed to ensuring the investigation into Charlie Kirk’s assassination is thorough and exhaustive, pursuing every lead to its conclusion.
The full weight of America’s law enforcement agencies are actively following the evidence that has emerged, but our efforts extend beyond initial findings. We are examining every facet of this assassination.
We are meticulously investigating theories and questions, including the location from where the shot was taken, the possibility of accomplices, the text message confession and related conversations, Discord chats, the angle of the shot and bullet impact, how the weapon was transported, hand gestures observed as potential “signals” near Charlie at the time of his assassination, and visitors to the alleged shooter’s residence in the hours and days leading up to September 10, 2025.
Some details are known today, while others are still being pursued to ensure every possibility is considered. Our primary focus is to complete this investigation and deliver justice. To protect the integrity of the investigation and subsequent prosecution, we cannot release every piece of information we have to the public right now. We will ensure every question is addressed at the appropriate moment.
Regarding specific details, such as questions about the plane that allegedly turned off its transponder after departing from an airport near the assassination site, we can share updates when answers are confirmed. After interviews with the pilot and consultation with the FAA, we determined the transponder was not turned off. Incomplete flight data in rural areas caused the apparent gap.
The entire FBI mourns the loss of Charlie Kirk. We will not rest until justice is served, and our investigation into this assassination will continue until every question is answered.”
STONE: “This is beginning to look more & more like the JFK assassination & cover-up.” Duh! All they did was swap out Lee Harvey Oswald for Tyler James Robinson!
One of the good things about Charlie's death is that it is exposing people for who they really are.
Roger Stone, a long time political operative who has always "publicly" defended Laura Loomer, said this about her today after she bashed Tulsi & Joe:
"Hey Laura, Tulsi Gabbard and Joe Kent put their lives on the line to combat Islamic extremists in our military. They killed Joe's wife. What have you ever done other than run your mouth and collect checks?"
These are the types of honest posts - that break through the BS - that I catalogue and remember for the future.
In other words - just because you love a certain pundit, doesn’t mean they are telling you the truth about who they think is behind Charlie’s murder. Look at ALL sides and ask yourself: WHO HAD THE MOST TO GAIN FROM THE DEATH OF PRESIDENT TRUMP AND CHARLIE KIRK AND WHO HAD THE MEANS, MOTIVE AND OPPORTUNITY TO DO IT WITHOUT GETTING CAUGHT.
I’ve been watching the coverage on CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, News Nation, Fox, Newsmax and OAN and EVERY news network and pundit is frantically trying to distance themselves from Charlie's murder and even going so far as to pretend they always liked Charlie. Even guys like Van Jones of CNN who called white people a “virus” just a few days before Charlie died (and Charlie called him a racist for it) - is now saying he feels bad because he and Charlie could have been friends. I call CYA that smacks of a confession and seeking of repentance. Just saying…
BTW, this is the same point I made about Butler - there was NO footage of Crooks or Robinson running with a weapon. That’s a HUGE RED FLAG in itself. IMHO, they were both patsies who were set up before and after to appear to be the shooter.
Candace Owens said she was able to speak with the man who recorded the alleged footage of Tyler Robinson on the roof before the shooting. His testimony completely contradicts everything we’ve been told by the Utah SBI. His footage was recorded just 20 seconds before Charlie Kirk’s assassination, according to the timestamp.
The witness, who shot the video, allegedly saw the shooter holding a smaller firearm and believes Charlie was shot with a lightweight bullet. This witness also provided a description to Utah law enforcement that was originally issued by the dispatcher but later changed for the public. He says the assassin was wearing tactical gear, a face mask and “looked like a foreign agent.”
That was the original description given by the Utah authorities, and reported by Fox News, before they later changed it.
DISPATCHER: “He’s going to be wearing all black, black long gun, black tactical helmet, a black mask, possibly wearing a tactical vest and jeans.”
Also, Tyler was not a “trained marksman” as the fake news would have you believe.
It’s being reported now that Tyler turned himself in because he feared guns & was afraid of being shot by the Utah police - not because he was guilty. Duh! Does that sound like a mass murderer to you?
Also, a body language expert studied Tyler at the arraignment and said he was catatonic - no emotion at all - which means he has likely been drugged to the gills. They give these patsies “chemical lobotomies” using anti-psychotics so that they can’t remember anything and can’t fight back. I know what they can do with drugs because I worked in a treatment facility and saw it myself. That’s all part of the MKUltra program of brainwashing and indoctrination.
There are so many questions out there that TPUSA (Andrew Kolvet - who is Charlie’s executive producer and business partner) has been forced to respond to questions about why there was no exit wound on Charlie’s neck if he was shot in front.
Kolvet responded by saying that the surgeon said that the bullet went in through the front of the neck and did NOT exit at all. They say it hit Charlie's bone (neck vertebrae) and stopped and was found just under the skin. That's why they say there was no exit wound and no blood spatter behind.
If there WERE an exit wound in the back of his neck - from a Mauser .30-06 round - it would have been HUGE, correct?
We have seen NO footage of Tyler with a gun of any kind - running on the roof or whatever - and he was actually kind of a nerd, afraid of guns and not a very good shot. There are also several accounts of him changing his clothes several times during the “assassination” which is extremely hard to believe. That’s also as hard to believe as the ridiculous text exchange with the “trans” BF named “Lance Twiggs” that the Utah authorities tried to sell us.
There are also photos of Tyler enjoying a treat at the DQ right after he allegedly slaughtered Charlie just like Luigi Mangione and Nikolas Cruz went to McDonald’s right after those patsies completed their shootings!
This is how stupid they think we are.
Back to the forensics. Ballistics "experts" I've seen so far online have stated the shot that killed Charlie came anywhere from 75 to 143 yards out - either from above at a 7 degree angle or from on the ground straight ahead. Nobody can agree on where exactly it came from and no two sound recordings are the same.
Cullen is reporting there were 4 drones in the area and he believes that's where the shot came from and he believes that the front wound was the entrance wound. Cullen said that depending on which camera-phone recording he uses, he’s getting from 75 to 150 yards out. Others say Charlie was possibly shot from the rear - overhead behind the ear - and the bullet when through his neck and down. Others say he was shot from his mic. In other words, NONE of the ballistics confirms anything.
Cullen also says there was a US spy plane out of Langley or the Pentagon that dropped down to 335'- 600' above Lake Utah, 3 hours before Charlie was shot and 20 minutes after. What was an ISR aircraft doing loitering over Utah Lake near stall speed in striking distance of Utah Valley University during the Charlie Kirk assassination? To air launch drones at the Charlie Kirk assassination from a Bombardier HADES ISR jet?
CULLEN: “Why was a HADES spy plane descending to 600' above Lake Utah, 3 hours before Charlie Kirk was killed? Why did the same aircraft return, 20 minutes after he was killed, and descend to 335', slowing to 118 knots? To pick up the UAVs that killed Charlie?”
CULLEN: “Is there a rogue faction in the CIA (and FBI and local SBI for that matter) that plotted the assassination of Charlie Kirk? Apparently, yes.”
This is looking more and more like a possibility. That would also explain what happened at Butler. IT WOULD ALSO REQUIRE plants in the local PD, local FBI, local SBI, University and even TPUSA to pull this off - coordinated with Antifa and the Armed Queers to set up Tyler for the fall.
Others believe that the front wound was the exit wound and the shot came from behind and overhead. That’s also a possibility but one that Cullen disputes.
Others believe the bullet came from close-up, from behind or from the side, from a “phone-gun” - or some other device.
For example, in this close-up, you can see a man in a brown shirt - perhaps security - who looks out of place - with what appears to be some kind of device in his hand (perhaps a palm-pistol with the barrel between his fingers) pointing at Charlie right when he went down. Behind him, is another man with a phone and another man who appears to be making hand signals - although others dispute he was just adjusting his shirt and hat because it was hot.
There are a dozen theories and hundreds of videos and audio files but I’ve seen no thoughtful or conclusive high-definition proof of any kind. The most disturbing thing to me is that the cameras behind Charlie were dismantled immediately after the shooting, witnesses were shushed trying to make statements and the tent was compromised and broken down and not treated as a crime scene. They are already rebuilding over it. I’ve heard they did that because of “miscommunication” between the teams - but I find that explanation hard to believe.
If the shot came from a drone (UAV) - what kind of bullet does a UAV fire? What caliber do these “UAVs” shoot? Is it a 5.56 mm? What kind of entrance or exit wound would that make? Would that explain why the bullet didn't go through and through? I just read that the military replaced the 30.06 with the 5.56 mm and it CAN be stopped by bone. Here’s the difference.
IF the front wound was actually the EXIT wound - instead of the entrance wound - what kind of bullet would have made that hole? I think we need to ask that question as well. This man addresses that theory.
I asked AI some of these questions and this is what it said. BTW - I don’t automatically take AI as the truth - but I do use discernment, take what I need and leave the rest.
Yeah, I’m still not buying that his neck bone stopped the bullet they say caused his death. Just saying…something else is going on here IMHO. This is just a random X-ray of what they say happened.
So, what do we know? There WAS a spy plane out of Langley or the Pentagon there - and there were drones there. There were also drones at Butler.
TPUSA and the media are going with the theory that the shot came from 140 yards away from a Mauser 30.06 and penetrated the neck but was stopped by bone and lodged next to the skin and that Charlie is a MAN OF STEEL. This narrative doesn’t seem logical to me at all. This is only 15 minutes long and it’s the best summary I’ve seen of where we are at regarding Charlie’s murder...without hyperbole and clickbait hysteria. It’s worth your time.
https://rumble.com/v6zmyoi-the-parallels-between-the-murder-of-jfk-and-charlie-kirk.html
CHRIS MARTENSEN: “The standard .30-06 round will go all the way through 14" pine trees with ease. I'm sorry but this story isn't true. Also the force would have pushed Charlie's head backwards violently if it had absorbed and stopped the bullet completely. Simple laws of physics.”
I believe it was a smaller caliber projectile, subsonic, from the front or even from behind and above. It will be interesting to see what Kash comes up with. If they ARE able to use deadly drones to accomplish assassinations and distort the source altogether - that means they don’t even need to coerce and set up patsies in the future - they can use anybody in the crowd who looks funny or moves funny and ID them as a shooter. Chew on that.
Back to the patsy, Tyler James Robinson. While the media paints Tyler as some kind of demon (who might not even exist) - here’s footage of Tyler, with his younger brother, was in a car accident three years ago in Utah, when he was 19, and his mother came to the scene to talk to the police. It's a bodycam video of that interaction that was just pulled by a news agency.
Is it possible that this is how Tyler became "known" to the local operatives and was put on their radar to be considered a vulnerable "potential" patsy for some future MKUltra operation? Yes. Nerdy kids like this make perfect patsies.
Creating patsies
Somebody asked me today how I think the swamp gets patsies to take the fall for professional hit jobs - like the one that just happened again in Minnesota. Here's how I replied:
Whether you believe Tyler is a patsy or not, or you believe the bullet came from in front or behind - it’s important that we remember that most of these “theories” are being presented in order to make us forget we are ONE and that we have enemies on the left who want us dead. I truly believe that the people who murdered JFK and RFK and MLK and Charlie and tried to murder Trump are the same!
Utah prosecutors said they are preparing to turn over a “substantial amount of digital discovery” in the case against Tyler Robinson, the 22-year-old accused of assassinating Charlie Kirk. Prosecutors said their entire case is basically based on “digital evidence.”
Huh? You mean the kind of “digital evidence” that ANYONE can fabricate on the Dark Web?
Robinson was NOT in court for his second appearance with his new public defender - he only appeared by audio. Huh? Why?
Robinson was originally scheduled to appear in court in person for the first time, but officials with the Utah County Attorney’s Office announced that they decided he would listen virtually instead. Huh? Utah County officials had also previously announced attorney Kathryn Nester, a PUBLIC DEFENDER, WAS APPOINTED BY THE UTAH COURT to represent Robinson. I thought this kid was getting a good lawyer?
Public defender Kathryn Nester asked for more time before a preliminary hearing is scheduled, saying the team needs to “get our heads around” the evidence.
No plea has been entered. The next court date is Oct. 30, when Robinson is expected to appear in person.
Remember, the DOJ and FBI aren’t involved in this - it’s all Utah, the Utah SBI, the Utah PD - all home to Governor Spencer Cox, a RINO progressive Mormon who wants to be President.
DAVID LIMBAUGH: "I'm concerned that MAGA is developing some serious fractures that could erupt near the end of President Trump's term. I believe Charlie probably perceived that, which is why he was trying to ensure dialogue among the factions, which led some to believe, erroneously, he was changing."
TPUSA SPOKESPERSON: "He did. He was very scared about this."
Yes, we are in a spiritual war and the enemy is real. Do not let the demon puppet masters turn us against each other.
Candace Owens has made over $2 MILLION off Charlie’s death so far acting as a limited hangout (meaning she is a false prophet and tells us little lies mixed with the truth to mislead us and keep us focused on anything BUT the truth.)
Here’s what I have to say about Candace if you are enthralled with her:
Candy from a baby
Did you know that David Horowitz called Candace the MONSTER he created before he died?
Andrew Kolvet (Charlie’s business partner and best friend) gave an hour-long interview after the funeral to answer some questions. I suggest we listen to it all and not just the spin:
Roger Stone wrote a good piece that covers many bases:
As someone who has written a New York Times best-selling book on the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, recently completed a book on the attempted assassination of President Ronald Reagan to be published this year, and studied the assassinations of Senator Robert F. Kennedy and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., as well as closely examined the two attempted assassinations of President Donald Trump, I have a deep and abiding distrust of information coming from our government and resist any rush to judgment about who killed Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk and why.
As details have come out about Charlie Kirk’s alleged assassin – 22-year-old radical leftist Tyler Robinson – it certainly fits a familiar and plausible narrative, the same mold that communist sympathizer and defector Lee Harvey Oswald fit into after he was rolled out after JFK was murdered in the public square on Dealey Plaza in Dallas.
Media reports that Robinson was radicalized on the internet by far-left extremists and lived with a transgender “female” (born a male), who was presumably his lover, gave conservatives something to latch onto. Hundreds of callous, disgusting people cheering on the murder only strengthen the resolve among conservatives to assign the blame to this radical leftist.
But considering the number of lies we have been told by the federal government on assassinations of the aforementioned public figures and shootings such as the Mandalay Bay Las Vegas shooting, we should automatically become skeptical about whoever we are told the “lone nut” gunman is. In this shooting, there are plenty of irregularities and anomalies that should have everyone considering whether there is more than meets the eye.
THE ALLEGED KILLER’S RIFLE AND CLOTHING
The bolt-action rifle allegedly used in the shooting was found in the woods nearby fully assembled after the killer made their getaway, essentially gift wrapped and left for authorities. Yet in CCTV footage, the alleged killer can be seen jumping off of a rooftop but no rifle can be seen, and the bag he was carrying was too small to contain the rifle, even if the rifle was disassembled as has been suggested.
Under this scenario, Robinson would have had to reassemble a rifle and leave it in the woods for law enforcement to find while making his getaway. Highly unlikely. According to the official story, Robinson also decided to change his clothes immediately after the shooting, which makes sense as those clothes could tie him to the scene. But then later on, Robinson incomprehensibly decided to change back into the exact same clothes which he could be identified in before he was apprehended by authorities. This makes little sense.
DISCORD DISCREPENCIES
The FBI stated that Robinson mentioned all of the details of how he plotted to kill Kirk, even bragging about how he committed the crime on the chat platform Discord that is popular among young people, particularly gamers. A spokesman from Discord contradicted the FBI’s story said they “identified a Discord account associated with the suspect, but have found no evidence that the suspect planned this incident or promoted violence on Discord” and said the “communications [were] between the suspect’s roommate and a friend after the shooting, where the roommate was recounting the contents of a note the suspect had left elsewhere.”
However, Utah Gov. Spencer Cox claimed that the FBI observed the incriminating communications between Robinson and his roommate over Discord, taking screenshots of the conversation. Newsmax, among others, has reported that Robinson actually denied that he assassinated Kirk, claiming initially that the killing was carried out by a doppelganger, only to later admit in the same Discord thread to committing the crime. All of this is curious—to say the least.
A DISAPPEARING JET
Immediately following the assassination, the FBI conspicuously failed to lockdown the airspace surrounding the Provo airport, which was only a ten-minute drive from Utah Valley University where Kirk was assassinated. Flight tracking data showed that a jet left the airport in Provo just after 2pm, heading southbound toward Arizona before disappearing from radar completely. It then reappeared on the radar as it returned to the Provo airport roughly one hour after initially departing. It remains unknown who was flying this jet and for what purposes.
KIRK’S POWERFUL ENEMIES
During a recent talk with journalist Megyn Kelly at a Turning Point event, Kirk talked about deceased pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s possible connections to the Israeli Mossad. Kirk also spoke candidly on his radio program about the connections between explicitly Jewish organizations and promoting anti-white causes. Tucker Carlson also told Kelly that Kirk traveled to the White House earlier this year to lobby President Trump not to engage in hostilities with Iran when it appeared the nation was on the verge of going to war with the country with the full backing of Israel. Carlson said this resulted in Kirk receiving “massive abuse” and anger from Turning Point’s donor base and caused Kirk to gain many “real enemies.”
Charlie Kirk and I became friends after my over-the-top arrest by the FBI as part of the Russian Collusion Hoax. Kirk became both a public and private advocate for clemency in my case even prior to the origins of the entire “Russian collusion” narrative being exposed as a political dirty trick and a massive abuse of power by Obama and his cabal of criminal cohorts.
Charlie spoke privately with me about his political ambitions, including a potential race for Governor of Arizona and even an eventual White House bid. I believed that Charlie had the discipline, principles, and drive to one day achieve these goals had he lived.
A MISSING BULLET
The FBI has yet to confirm that they have recovered the bullet from the Kirk shooting, with only the brass casing from the bullet being reported from the scene. When asked by Bret Baier of Fox News about whether a bullet had been recovered and matched to the rifle, Gov. Cox could not provide a definitive answer only saying that he believes what is being “processed” right now at the FBI Headquarters in Quantico, Virginia. The bullet casings allegedly found from the shooter contained anti-fascist messages, playing into the narrative that the shooter was a radicalized leftist. It is important to note that the Wall Street Journal breathlessly reported that the bullet casings also included pro-transgender messaging, although subsequent reports from the FBI report no such thing. The lack of a bullet being found, and no answers given as to why it has not been retrieved, raises additional suspicion about the FBI’s story.
A PECULIAR PROVOCATEUR
George Zinn, the leftist provocateur in the audience, caused a diversion and was detained at the perfect moment to give the rooftop shooter cover to perform their successful getaway. Zinn also was a witness to the Sept. 11 attacks and had been arrested in 2013 for making a false bomb threat during the Salt Lake City Marathon shortly after the Boston Marathon bombing. This dubious character being planted at the scene seems like more than an act of mere happenstance, especially considering he was arrested and hit with possession of media depicting child abuse days later. It would not be the first time that the feds have used a pedo predator for their own aims.
SHADY FIGURES AT ROBINSON’S TOWNHOUSE
It was revealed, hidden deep within a New York Post report, that a neighbor observed several shady characters driving cars that had out-of-state license plates coming and going frequently from the $1,800 a month townhouse that the alleged assassin Robinson shared with a transgender roommate, stating that these individuals “did not give off a good vibe.” Perhaps these people could be identified as his handlers if the FBI was interested in reviewing doorbell camera footage and investigating this lead.
DISAPPEARING CONFESSION LETTER
Then we were told that the alleged killer left a confession letter, but it was destroyed. Somehow, the FBI was still able to confirm what it said even though they never actually saw the letter. FBI Director Kash Patel told Fox and Friends: “The written note we believe what did exist, and we have evidence to show what was in that note, which is...the suspect wrote a note saying I have the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk and I am going to take it. That note was written before the shooting, evidence of its existence we now have learned existed before the shooting was in the location in the suspect and partner’s home. But we have since learned that the note even though it has been destroyed, we have found forensic evidence of the note and we have confirmed what that note says because of our aggressive interview posture at the FBI.” It’s hard to know what all of this actually means.
CONTRIVED NOTE WITH TRANSGENDER LOVER
As part of the alleged killer’s getaway plan that included leaving as much incriminating evidence around as possible, Robinson – according to the FBI – sent a stream of text messages to his transgender roommate confirming that he committed the murder, mentioned his rifle, said he targeted Kirk because of his “hatred,” told the drop point of the rifle, said who he received the rifle from, talked about how he changed his outfits and admitted to etching meme-related messages into the bullets. Many have pointed out that if investigators were to contrive a statement as part of a cover-up, it would contain all of these points because the message is seemingly designed to get people to look the other way and stop asking questions.
OTHER TROUBLING DETAILS
There were several individuals identified in the audience in close proximity to Kirk at the time of his assassination who were making peculiar hand gestures and odd body movements in the moments before Kirk was shot. Could some of these men have known about what was going to take place? It appears that several transgender activists did, as eerily foreboding comments surfaced referencing the Kirk assassination shortly before it took place. FBI Director Kash Patel was reportedly incensed at his underlings at the Bureau because they waited 12 hours to show him a photo of the suspected killer, according to multiple sources. If FBI agents were keeping Patel in the dark about these crucial details, what else could they be keeping him in the dark about?
These details make it impossible to dismiss foul play or a broader conspiracy that went into the assassination of Kirk. The “lone nut” theory, used time and again by the feds to keep the public from asking uncomfortable questions, is not going to suffice in this case. There are an abundance of questions about the official story, and definitive answers are needed. The public must demand these answers or be another instance of a cover-up hiding the true agenda behind one of our era’s most iconic and revered leaders being gunned down in their prime – a shame that has become all too common in American culture.
Many RINO influencers, Candace Owens and Koch Libertarians are trying to blame Israel for Charlie’s death instead of examining all sides for the most likely culprit. Charlie’s letter to Bibi helps clear that up.
Charlie's Letter
THIS IS THE LETTER THAT CHARLIE KIRK SENT TO BIBI NETANYAHU 90 DAYS BEFORE HE WAS MURDERED. THIS PROVES JUST HOW MUCH HE LOVED THE JEWISH PEOPLE.
Who is really funding it all? Here’s what I think.
Who is REALLY behind it all?
Many people have asked me to explain who on earth I think are ultimately AT THE TOP of the financial pyramid - and the human puppet masters behind all the chaos in the world. Who the heck are really behind the satanic cabal called the New World Order (NWO) and who do they give direction to? Who ULTIMATELY ordered the hit on
This was Part 7 of my report on Charlie’s murder. You can find all the previous chapters here: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7. I suggest you read them in order - they build on each other to create the whole picture.
My work is free and supported by your generous donations. Thank you to all who have donated in the past. I truly appreciate your generosity!
If you like my work, you can fund me by becoming a paid subscriber on Substack, donate by credit card here or you can send me a check to Peggy Tierney, PO Box 242, Spooner, Wisconsin 54801- or just send me a note or a card! I love hearing from you.
You can find and search over 1000 of my free newsletters at my website here.






























































