Tucker & Putin: Part Two

I hope by now you’ve had a chance to watch or read the transcript of Tucker’s interview with Putin - which is one of the most TELLING interviews I’ve ever seen. So far, nearly half a BILLION people have watched that interview from around the world - and I hope you do too.

I also hope you’ve had a chance to read Part One of my analysis of the interview - which covered Tucker’s introduction and a little bit about Putin’s history lesson. There are hidden meanings everywhere in that interview that I think people need to understand.

Before we get into the next part of my analysis of Tucker’s interview - you need to know about a few things that have happened SINCE the interview which are very important in putting the entire thing in context. None of this is being reported by the fake news!

FIRST, Tucker gave a follow up on his interview with Putin that same evening - where he said, rather arrogantly I thought, about Putin:

TUCKER: "Putin’s not good at explaining himself. He’s smart, there is no question about that. He’s clearly spending a lot of time in a world where he doesn’t have to explain himself."

Hmm. I thought that was odd - not only in what Tucker said but how he said it. I thought Putin explained himself very well. He had an encyclopedic knowledge of his views of Russian history and talked for 30 minutes straight about it without notes.

SECOND, Tucker went on to tour Moscow and made several points - that sanctions against Russia aren’t working because Russian subways and streets are cleaner and safer than America’s and prices are lower.

TUCKER: “What was shocking for me what the city of Moscow, where I had never been. The biggest city in Europe, 13 million people. It is so much nicer than any city in my country. I had no idea. It is so much cleaner, and safer and prettier, aesthetically. Its architecture, food, and services than in any city in the United States. And this is not ideological. How did that happen?”

“First things first, Putin wants to get out of this war. Russia's industrial potential is a lot more profound than we thought it was. Russia is having a pretty easy time making missiles, rockets, and artillery shells, whereas NATO doesn't.”

THIRD, Tucker then gave another interview at the World Government Summit in the UAE where they praised Tucker for “doing his homework” on Putin and then asked: “Why did you decide to do the interview now?”

TUCKER: “We’ve been trying to do this interview for three years. The US Government prevented me from doing it by spying on my text messages and leaking them to the New York Times. That spooked [Putin] into cancelling the interview.”

Hmm. I’m not buying that excuse. Three years? Tucker’s been out of Fox for over a year. I believe Tucker released the interview NOW for a reason.

Tucker also went on to say that Putin is more competent than Biden AND that he has no idea who will be running in November on either side. Tucker refused to comment on the US November election at all and said the US is the most powerful nation in the world and basically said that whatever happens will be what’s best for the US. Tucker said the fact that he doesn’t have any idea who will run (Trump, Biden, etc.) is a sign that Tucker is wiser than others.

Again, I found this odd. The host of the World Government Summit praised Tucker for all his research on Putin - yet did not praise Putin for his history lesson. I thought the interview demonstrated that Putin did his homework - not Tucker.

Also, Tucker made a point that Putin is more competent than Biden and even implied that somehow this means that Putin & Trump are on the same side and working against Biden. I didn’t like that either.

LAST, Putin gave an interview to Russia Today where he said exactly the opposite of what Tucker said. Putin said, with a smile on his face, that Tucker had a motive and an agenda for his interview with Putin and he was committed to it and he would not deviate.

In other words, Putin gave his history lesson hoping that Tucker would ask more hard questions about what the history meant in terms of foreign policy. Putin said he wanted tough questions from Tucker but Tucker did not ask them. In fact, when the camera wasn’t on - Putin asked Tucker to ask him some hard questions. When he didn’t, Putin called Tucker “dangerous.”

PUTIN: “I think Carlson is a dangerous man. I thought he would be aggressive, ask me sharp questions. I was not just ready for that, I wanted that, so I could give equally sharp answers. But he chose a different tactic.”

Then, Putin went on to say SPECIFICALLY that people like Secretary of State Blinken and others, in the Obama-Biden regime, believe that their ancestors were persecuted in Russia, fled during Jewish pogroms and that they hate Russia because this is personal for them. Putin mentioned this to Tucker when the cameras were off but Tucker refused to ask about it! This is exactly what I said in Part One of my analysis!

Putin said that the one topic that Carlson refused to discuss with Putin on camera was the historic pogroms of Jews in Russia. Instead, the two talked about it when the cameras were switched off.

Putin said that western politicians often bring up the pogroms “to demonize Russia” and portray the Russian people as a county of scoundrels - instead of telling the entire story which is much more complex and implicates many other players.

Putin said that US Secretary of State Antony Blinken comes from a family of Russian Jewish immigrants who fled pogroms in Kiev, Russia. For Blinken, the hatred against Russia is personal - as it is with Victoria Nuland. Putin said that Blinken has basically admitted that Ukraine did NOT exist when his ancestors escaped persecution in Russia. But Tucker refused to talk about that.

When asked who he prefers to win the November election, Putin said he preferred Biden:

PUTIN: “Biden. He is a more experienced and predictable person, he is a politician of the old sort. But we will work with any leader who gets the confidence of the American people.”

Putin brushed aside Biden’s cognitive decline by saying he hadn’t really seen it when he met with Biden in Switzerland three years ago.

PUTIN: “So what if [Biden] whacked his head coming out of a helicopter? Who among us hasn’t hit his head on a helicopter, let him cast the first stone. I am not a doctor.”

Remember that Putin also supported Hillary over Trump - contrary to the fake news stating otherwise.

Putin also commented on the recent remarks by Trump about NATO members who aren’t paying their fair share for protection. Trump said that NATO needs to pay up for protection or the US will NOT defend them any longer!

Putin said that Trump’s approach to NATO “has a certain logic,” because NATO “is an instrument of US foreign policy,” and if the US decides it no longer has use for it, that’s Washington’s prerogative, Putin said. “Let them sort it out themselves.”

How did President Trump respond to the news that Putin endorsed Biden over Trump? He said that was good!

TRUMP: "Now that's a compliment. Putin would prefer Biden because he's not as harsh against Russia as I am. I got along good with Putin, but he doesn't want to have me [in the White House.] The war would never have started if I were President. Putin would never have invaded if I were President.”

So, what happened next? Well, suddenly the Biden administration says Putin has “space nukes” and we need to send more money to Ukraine to fight them and it’s time for World War 3! WTH!

So, Putin told Tucker that he has been willing to talk peace for over a year, and suddenly we’re at DEFCON 3 because Russia has nukes in space? Obama-Biden want WW3 against Russia so bad that the Obama-Biden administration will say whatever they need to say to make it happen!

Putin told Russia Today he prefers Biden over Trump because he’s more controllable and predictable and suddenly Biden wants to blow up the world? WE ARE BEING PLAYED. Biden can’t use the “Trump-Russia” collusion narrative any longer because Putin just put THAT to rest! Checkmate.

As you can see, the history of Russia & Ukraine is important - not only from a foreign policy perspective but because it also frames the motivations of many players involved in making foreign policy decisions on behalf of the United States and its allies.

It’s obvious to me that Tucker is playing the role of a US proxy for the CIA on the world stage in dealing with Putin. The good news is that Biden is being neutered and we are learning a lot in the light of day!

Next, in Part Three of this essay, I will begin to detail what happened in Russia/Ukraine from 988 to pre-Putin 1991 (including the Mongol invasion, the rise of the Bolsheviks and the Soviet Union, Jewish pogroms and persecution in Russia-Ukraine, WW2, the pact between Stalin and Hitler and other strange alliances) which will help explain why we are where we are today. Until then, have a great weekend!